A
former paratrooper who led an aborted coup 1992 but achieved
the goal of becoming president by democratic means, Hugo
Chávez has split the country into Chavistas and anti-Chavistas.
Rather
than a confrontation of ideological or political differences,
however, it is trust that differentiates the two sides.
While
the literati, political observers, economists, investors
and Venezuelans in general are racking their brains trying
to answer the Shakespearean “to believe or not to believe”
in Chávez, the country, and more so the media, are enjoying
something almost forgotten in this supposedly evolved nation:
total freedom of expression.
This
is quite a surprise coming from a self-proclaimed aggressive
revolutionary whom many Venezuelans fear will end up establishing
an authoritarian regime or even a dictatorship.
Paradoxically,
at least four out of the eight governments of the last 40
years of democracy subjected the Venezuelan media to restrictions,
antagonism and freedom of expression of varying degrees.
Another
Chávez surprise is the flood of newsworthy material he has
generated, as if Venezuelan journalists had suffered from
a news shortage for years. According to one Caracas television
station, the loquacious president, whose speeches are surpassed
in length only by those of Fidel Castro in his hay day,
has held seven press conferences and has spoken or appeared
on TV no less than 21 times in his first 100 days in office.
What
keeps this impressive volume of verbosity from appearing
overabundant is the unpredictability of the presidential
arguments and the contradicting signals Chávez sends, which
keeps everybody guessing, trying to plot in which direction
he is heading.
Chávez,
for example, has repeatedly attacked private sector leaders
for failing to distribute a larger share of profits to workers
and employees. Yet the government has decreed only a modest
20 percent salary increase for public workers and has courteously
invited the private sector to do likewise.
As
another example, Chávez acceptance of the fact that squatters
invaded private property sent a very scary signal to property
and business owners. Yet he has repeatedly assured local
and foreign investors that he is working on an investment
protection law that he has promised to produce before the
end of summer.
Another
reason why the media and Venezuelans pay attention to Chávez’s
speeches and TV appearances is his mixture of impassioned
populist rhetoric and his rough, unconventional style, off-the-wall
expressions and colorful anecdotes. In more than two occasions
Chávez has woken up journalists caught dozing during boring
and repetitious parts of his TV speeches by calling out
to his press secretary: “Martín, serve these people some
more coffee/”
A
lover of baseball, a sport he used to practice, Chávez recently
invited the Chicago Cubs’ Sammy Sosa to Venezuela and organized
a TV show in a Caracas stadium in which he pitched to the
homerun hitter so he could display his skill to the whole
nation. Chávez also resorts to baseball to explain to the
nation what he is up to, using expressions such as “I am
going to go to bat from the very first inning,” to indicate
that he is going to play an active role from the very beginning,
or “I am pitching Congress a slow ball in the center of
the plate,” to indicate that he is going to make life easy
for congressmen.
His
repertoire of anecdotes can often be quite folkloric, going
as far as describing how as a corporal he and his platoon
of soldiers looked after a bunch of pigs eventually destined
to feed the troops.
The
volume of news, interest and the color, however, would not
be half as appreciated were it not that the journalistic
community enjoys an absolute freedom of expression and of
speech. At first, it was believed that this was influenced
by Presidential Secretariat Minister Alfredo Peńa and Foreign
Minister José Vicente Rangel, two veteran journalists well
acquainted with past press difficulties and restrictions.
But
then, as leading newspapers increased their criticism of
the administration, Chávez repeatedly shrugged off their
attacks, claiming that he does not fear negative press opinion
and cares only about what the people say. Chávez is now
the subject of an even more serious opinionated challenge
from the Caracas afternoon newspaper El Mundo,
under the new editorial management of popular socialist
politician Teodoro Petkoff, a former revolutionary himself.
But so far, two well-documented Petkoff attacks against
the military and the National Electoral Council have been
respectfully rejected by Chávez and his government, leading
the Venezuela media to hope that after several decades of
relative liberties, freedom of the expression may finally
be back to stay.
(June
8, 1999)